Filed under San Francisco State of Mind

A tall tale a day keeps the ugly ones away.

Note: Originally, I tippity-typed this masterpiece of social commentary in April, immediately following the event. However, I thought it deserved republication here.

Being the new kid on the techie block, I figured the best way to get my feet (soaking) wet was to simply dive in head first. With the Web 2.0 Expo in town this week, there was opportunity after opportunity to rub elbows with some of Internetland’s most notorious royalty and share drinks with Web 2.0′s biggest egos. And, really, who am I to miss an opportunity of that caliber?

So, on a blustery Monday evening in this beautiful city by the bay, I summoned one of my most delightful and flirtatious bachelor friends, and off we skipped (read: hurriedly scurried because our nipples were beginning to freeze solid) to the Engage.com Love 2.0 event at Harlot.

Amidst a few jilted, over-the-shoulder conversations with another friend and machete-ing my way through the crowd so I could score a round (or three) of free mini-drinks at the bar, I couldn’t help but overhearing the end of the most curious exchange between an uncharacteristically outgoing guy (for a techie geek, anyway) and two inquisitively rapt ladies.

“…and before this, I was in the circus.”

Hmmm. My ears were perked, but my interest level didn’t progress much further than that. In fact, I didn’t think much of it until I was standing next to him in the queue for beers. Of course, at that point, my curiosity got the best of me. He also happened to know the gentleman with whom I arrived at the party, and the three of us got to talking.

After the requisite introductions were made and niceties were exchanged, the dapper don turned to my friend and bragged, “Hey, man, guess what? I just told those girls I was in the circus! Isn’t that a good one?”

What?” I exclaimed with exaggerated disbelief and a playful slap to his arm. “You weren’t really in the circus? I believed you!”

“Oh, no, ha!” he chuckled nervously, unrolling into a shy but mischievous grin. “I only tell them that when they’re…well, you know.”

No, I didn’t know. “You know?” I asked, hoping I’d get a bit more detail.

He squirmed. “Yeah, um, you know…” he trailed off, obviously leaving me to fill in the very gaping, very obvious blank.

I took my best stab at the equation. “Ugly?” I retorted, with a smirk and a knowing look.

With a tight-lipped, sheepish smile, he confirmed my suspicions as true. I merely shook my head, and attempted to return my efforts to securing the bartender’s attention to my alcoholic pursuits.

“So,” he said, sidling up to me in jest, aiming to reduce that mountain to a molehill, “Did you know I also was a trapeze artist?”

What could I do? I laughed. “Save it, sugar. It’s not working on me!”

Tagged , , , , ,

I’m proud to be BlogHer-bound.

I first learned of BlogHer in 2005, when a friend living in the Bay Area made her way to the conference and sang its indisputable praises afterwards. It seemed like the loveliest (not to mention most revolutionary) idea – a conglomeration of female bloggers (well, the majority of them, anyway) from all walks of life, all sorts of writing experience levels, all forms of notoriety. Discussing the hefty role of women in the blogosphere, their impact, and their future. Amazing. Simply, undeniably fantastic. And highly intriguing. Although, lucky for me, I was a broke, unemployed law graduate (hey, wait a minute…) living in Ohio with my parents post-bar exam at the time. So my attendance was unfortunately impossible, save through any method but virtual support (at which I’m damn skilled, if I do say so myself). But, as a newly-established blogger (for a blog now defunct), I vowed that if I ever got the opportunity to attend this gathering of bright, opinionated lady authors, I’d seize it.

Fast forward to 2008. I’m currently living in San Francisco, and, lo and behold, BlogHer’s annual event is practically in my backyard (well, if I had one), and returning to its roots in Babylon by the Bay. Could I possibly deny the forces of scheduling at work here? I’d be a fool to shun ‘em. It’s pretty much in the cards that I am in attendance this year. So, I researched relenting to the forces that be.

However, ironically enough, I have once again found myself as a broke, unemployed law graduate (theme establishment, anyone?), so I will only be hobnobbing at the networking events (“cocktail parties,” if you’re nasty) at the end of the day’s work.

Or will I? Because, by a stroke of luck and well-informed connections, the rockin’ Gwen Bell hooked me up with her buds at Zwaggle to do a bit of a mini-evangelism to spread the good word of sharing and sharing alike. So perhaps I will get that glimpse of Dooce after all!

Zwaggle‘ll be keepin’ it eco-friendly at BlogHer ’08 by allowing BlogHer-goers to recycle their unwanted swag in favor of those who need it more. That’s kinda what they do on the regular, and now they’re bringin’ the goodness to BlogHer on a smaller scale. I mean, let’s be honest. How much of that conference swag are you actually keeping? Do you need every pen, notepad, and t-shirt you’ve acquired over the course of three days? Yeah, exactly. Zwaggle didn’t think so either.

One day, I thought I’d be missing BlogHer altogether due to my inability to keep the second and third weeks of July straight, and the next, I’m fixin’ to attend the Alltop/Kirtsy fete at Guy Kawasaki‘s house, I’m helping a great company like Zwaggle spread (and recollect!) the love, and I’m shindiggin’ at cocktail parties with the smartest of the scrawlin’ smarties for the entire weekend long.

My excitement is immeasurable, at this point. I’d overuse exclamation points, but I do that all the time, and it would just be trite. But, for the record, yay!

P.S. – Download (don’t print) the Pre-Conference Guide!

Tagged , , , , , ,

So, uh, yeah. Boys are weird.

You can speculate all you want on the reasoning behind excessive, competitive chile pepper eating. I mean, you’d never find me engaging in such behavior, and I love hot peppers. All of ‘em, in everything, from eggs to rice to sandwiches to bagels. Make it spicy, baby, and make it ache! To the point where it burns my lips, makes my nose run, and forces unrecognizability upon my poor, unsuspecting tongue. However, all bets are off once those itty bitty vegetables of fire take a toll on my tummy, and I surrender before it hits the point where my derreire is glued to the toilet seat. Um, ahem.

But for some of us, namely the boy version of the species? Well, they just don’t know when to quit.

As a result, the above video features a Chile Pepper Eating Contest. Oh, thank goodness, a contest. To see who can ruin their bellies the fastest. I mean, what?

The premise? Ramit‘s birthday, and hence, the Ram-It Olympics (get it?). Stocked with equal parts competitive spirit, raging testosterone, and varying levels of intoxication, from a little buzzed to full-on shrieking inebriation, the Ram-It Olympics could be nothing but a side-splitting success. The attending menfolk in particular, when presented with the slightest opportunity to flex their proverbial muscles, have a machismo that I will never seem to understand; one that they seek to capitalize upon almost daily. Good thing we women were blessed with bigger, sharper brains and more common sense in order to exploit their idiocy. Um, did I say idiocy? I meant gallantry. Yes, that’s what I meant.

Featured in the video above, we have a case in point study of said valiant deeds. Ask a woman why you’d want to chow on the equivalent of gastrointestinal knives at the highest speed possible, and you’d get the only answer that makes any sense: “I wouldn’t.” But the men, oh, those men heave-ho with everything they’ve got, and such a response remains a mystery to me.

But no bother. It made for some interesting spectator activities, at the very least.

Tagged , , , , , , ,

They kicked and they balled.

Ustream reigned supreme after their match.Yesterday evening, a gaggle of Web 2.0′s finest geeks and I headed to Hippie Hill in Golden Gate Park for the inaugural Friday round of Kickball for Geeks 2008. My favorite Community Evangelist, Kristine of PBwiki, orchestrated the entire event, and six teams participated in the post-work festivities. The sting of the [ridiculously chilly] weather was eased by cases of booze for each team before and throughout, and the sting of bruised egos and severed limbs (kidding!) was eased by wings, nachos, and guacamole at Kezar Pub after.

Social lubricant notwithstanding, quite a few rivalries were rekindled, rearing their ugly heads during the course of the activities. However, as the mere photographer, I’m not going to be the one to fan the flames. There’s a time and a place for smack talk. Let this neutral observer be. But you can check the photos and stir the pot yourself.

Tagged , , , , , ,

I can’t get no satisfaction.

Can you hear them bells a-ringin’? It’s ’cause the times they are a-changin’, my friend, and a new day is a-comin’. That’s right. Yeah, yeah, of course I’m being a bit dramatic, but the ides of the year are upon us again. Screw March; ’tis the season for life-related upheavals!

Yes, you read that right. Life-related upheavals. Allow me to explain.

It seems that, en masse, quite a few of my friends are demanding – and taking – more out of their lives at this particular time of year. Not that this occurs with any sort of regularity, but when it happens, it really strikes the ground with the loudest of thwacks. And as a result, there have been countless earth-shattering breakups, engagements, monumental career changes, fulfillments of life goals, and relocations. For example.

Last night was a celebration of one such occasion. After three satisfying years in the Bay Area, a dear friend of mine will be packing his rucksack and heading off to Chicago, the Midwestern mecca of wind and snow. While a somber event in terms of our friendship, I can’t quite complain too loudly, as I am prone to doing the same on a more regular basis than most. Besides, with the advent of Twitter, Facebook, and blogging, well, you’re never as far away as you think you are anymore.

However, that’s not really my point. My point is, while at this shindig, I met (well, re-met – we most certainly had been introduced before under more inebriated circumstances) a friend of a friend who was a practicing attorney. The lives of practicing attorneys are always of some interest to me, simply because, as a graduate of law school myself, it allows me a small glimpse of who I could’ve been, or who I had the chance to be. You know, how the traditional law graduate lives his/her life post-law school.

In the eyes of the law school gods, this particular attorney had done everything right. She summered (read: was a summer associate) at a BigLaw firm after her second year, accepted a six-figure-plus job offer with said BigLaw firm immediately out of law school, passed the bar, and has been working at her firm for the past four years. On paper, she had the law student’s dream come true. Especially compared to me, an unlicensed law school graduate who has dabbled in almost every field in the three years since she graduated. Except the practice of law, that is.

But ever so oddly enough, in the middle of that dusky bar, with all of our career differences splayed between us, we two legal minds found common ground. Ironically, despite the drastically contrasting paths we’d pursued since graduation, the two of us completely saw eye-to-eye regarding the state of our careers. Isn’t that remarkable?

She and I – the seasoned, practicing attorney and the law-shunning techie do-gooder – somehow commiserated on the most rudimentary of career concerns; namely, that we weren’t getting satisfaction out of our salaried choices. And, try as we might, we seemingly couldn’t find the inroad to our true path to professional happiness. And neither one of us had even an inkling of an idea where to even look when it came to our next feasible step.

The similarities between us truly shocked me. Here we were, scholars of the law that had taken two completely different professional paths, only to end up equally as disappointed with the law and the opportunities (or lack thereof) afforded to us in the end. Does that sound like I’m looking a gift horse in the mouth? I’m not.

Here’s the thing – the people that end up in law school are the type that expect to work hard for the rest of their lives. We are the types that want work to become us, overtake us, and define us. We anticipate it, and we relish its onset. We are used to long hours of studying and we are used to sleepless nights, weekends, even weeks without proper respite. These sorts of challenges don’t faze us, because, after all, we are training to become the gatekeepers of the law, formally or informally. We realize that the responsibility is great, and we realize that becoming an attorney means shedding your old self, for better or for worse, and slipping into this new skin for all eternity.

But ask any attorney my age if they like what they’re doing, and you’ll get a surprisingly half-hearted response, preceded by a deep sigh and a long sound laden with uncertainty on how to diplomatically approach the question without sounding utterly miserable.

This level of career discontent is acutely obvious and exampled within my personal sphere of friends. Three years post-law school, almost all of my friends are squarely confronting the fact that their legal careers have been less than satisfying in almost all regards. Many of them have switched employers in the past three years, and although only a few of them have left the practice of law entirely, the doubts about law are sentiments that have been expressed more than twice:

  • The insurance litigation attorney fantasizing about careers in merchandise buying and higher education administration;
  • The landlord-tenant attorney tenaciously attempting to bridge her way into intellectual property with every new application submitted;
  • The intellectual property litigation attorney looking to shun BigLaw by heavily researching the possibility of solo practice;
  • The general litigation attorney that ditched the field for employee benefits;
  • The big city BigLaw attorney that disappeared to a ranch and waiting tables in the American West, only to abandon her hopes of opening a bar, admit her dependence, and reluctantly return to BigLaw;
  • The licensed attorney doing tax consulting and glorifying the day he’ll get a chance to apply for jobs in litigation; and
  • The government attorney wishing she could get a shot at BigLaw.

And the list goes on and on and on.

So, where do we find satisfaction in this field? We, the disillusioned, the dissatisfied, the once-idealistic, budding doctors of the law? Or, perhaps the better question is, can we find satisfaction in this field? And if not, then what?

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: